« Let’s get real about the NSA. Not all technology and data is born equal. There is no such thing as 100% security, but let’s raise our bar | Main | Should we teach politicians the basics of business analysis and problem solving? As we enter an election period lots of “ideas” and “policies” being mooted… oh dear »

23/09/2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Colin Beveridge

Gobsmacked. Seems like an incredibly retrograde step. I can appreciate that an organization like Microsoft has a seriously complex challenge. But that is simply a cost of doing that sort of business. When it comes to software integrity, the whole is only as strong as its weakest link, or component. Enterprise quality assurance [and their customers' confidence] surely demands a properly integrated governance regime. A piecemeal approach looks like a recipé for disaster, sooner or later.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

February 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28